Thursday, April 13, 2017

This is Almost Too Stupid for Me to Make Fun of

This was written by a philosophy grad student named Shelley Garland.   Philosophy used to be one of the toughest rows to hoe in the university system.  The academic rigor was as stringent as it was brutal.

Lets see what a modern grad can come up with.

Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. 

Yes, 2016 will be remembered as one of the greatest years in the advancement of all mankind in human history. I'm glad she enjoyed it as much as I did.  

If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, 

Was there anything 2016 didn't do for us? (*Cataline wipes a manly tear from his eye*)

and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa's biggest cities.



Meet Mmusi Maimane
He's the White Man who currently leads the Democratic Alliance in South Africa.


If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. 

Poor girl. She is clearly terrified by the thought. And rightfully so, without the government harvesting white men's wallets there is no way in hell she could be living the Life of Julia that she clearly is.

The influence of reckless white males were (SP) one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. 

Her assertion is as weak as her grammar. She provides no evidence to back up her statement.

This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.

Toxic White Feminism is the one of the greatest disasters to befall the human race. 

See, I can make baseless assertions too! Although in my case I also have pictures to the prove it.


Yep, that's the same girl



At the same time, a denial of the franchise to white men, could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners. 

The rightful owners already possess those assets darling, it's called property law. Here is a quick refresher on how that works.




After all, white men have used the imposition of Western legal systems around the world to reinforce modern capitalism. A period of twenty years without white men in the world's parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world's wealth far more equitably shared. 

That would probably be enough time to bankrupt the entire planet, reduce the population of the human race to about five million due to starvation and force all of us to live in caves.  So she is right about that.

The violence of white male wealth and income inequality will be a thing of the past.

The violence of white male wealth?!?!  I've never seen a dollar beat up anybody.  At this point she is just smashing words together and hoping a coherent concept emerges.





Although she is dead right about the income inequality. All income will be pretty equal when money is completely worthless.

This redistribution of the world's wealth is long overdue, and it is not just South Africa where white males...
Aaaaand I'm done.

The rest of this article is just Marxist babble Since this is some hate-bait piece from the HuffPo, I'm not giving them the link.

In 2007 it was safer to be a combat Marine in Iraq than it is to be a White farmer today in South Africa. White South Africans are facing the very real possibility of genocide and this virago will be cheer leading for it when it kicks off. All in in the name of Wealth Redistribution of course. 

Communism killed more people than any other political idea in human history.  It has abjectly failed every time it's been tried and this politicized mental zombie wants more of it.
 
Garland started this entire article on the premise that the world would be a better place without the the White Male Voter.  

Just reading it makes a strong case for the repeal of the 19th Amendment.

7 comments:

Jew613 said...

So what's the argument for Marxism? At 100 million murdered, their due for a win!

In all seriousness this article reads like it is a 5th grade essay from a student who wasn't very interested in the subject

Though I am glad to see Cataline is coming to realize the disaster that is women's suffrage.

Cataline Sergius said...

Honestly, universal male suffrage was a bad idea.

Jew613 said...

Well the old deal was in a Republic since all men are subject to the draft and fighting and dying for the country they should all have a say in its government. Though since women were never drafted why they got the vote is beyond me.

Though most western countries have done away with the draft so there isn't much rational argument even for male universal suffrage anymore.

For whatever it's worth I've long believed the old mixed system with a monarchy, limited democracy and entrenched aristocracy worked best. We've tried democracy and the results are ugly.

Friar Bob said...

@Jew613

Part of that is frustration talking. The current system of a façade democracy covering for an unconstitutional oligarchy is totally FUBAR. We've got all the bad features of a corrupt aristocracy and none of the good. So it seems logical that monarchy can't be any worse.

But it too can be pretty awful. Without a strong sense of noblesse oblige in the aristocracy, it will eventually become basically what we have today... or what they had in France shortly before the rise of such wonderful historical figures as Robespierre and Napoleon.

Jew613 said...

Friar Bob, from your comment I'm pretty sure you've made a innocent mistake which is falling for the Leftist propaganda masquerading as history. The supposed history your taught in school of the time leading up to the anti-Monarchist revolutions is largely Jacobite propaganda. It would be like reading a history of the Labor movement written by the National Right To Work Committee or a history of the Republican party written by the Daily Kos.

Even if the worst offenses of the Ancien Regime were true they would still be better then what we have now. The basic worldview of a King is radially different then an elected government. The Democrat views his country the way a a tenant who is renting land to mine views it. He wants to take everything of value and make his escape. A Monarch views the country as a sacred trust he will pass on to his progeny. Whatever their failings the Monarchs as a group at least wanted good for their countries. The same cannot be said for the elected Western governments.

bob kek mando ( i'd like to be John Scalzi, sir Procrustes. can you de-nut me? or, you know, you could just cut me off at the waist and then i'd also be a half-man, just like my an hero ) said...

Well the old deal was in a Republic since all men are subject to the draft


THIS Republic never had a draft.

not until Abe destroyed the Constitution and rendered the Republic null and void.

not that that ever made any difference.

at the founding of the nation and signing of the Constitution, something like 30% of free White Men had the franchise.

yet 100% of the men between 15 and 50 could be called up to the militia. on a VOLUNTARY basis.


you want to declare war when 70% of the fighting men don't get a say in whether we attack Canada or Mexico? good on ya.

now, find somebody to fight that war for you. refusal to serve is the militia man's veto in the case of a restricted franchise.

kind of funny how you're lecturing someone else on their maleducation ...

JP said...

I wonder, if you give a million cult-Marxists typewriters​ and made them type for a million years, by sheer chance would one of them produce a logical argument? And if so, who would we hate enough to torture by making them read through it all?