Tuesday, March 7, 2017

Transgender Debate: Literally

A female (naturally) poli sci professor at NYU was convinced that Hillary only lost because of her sex, so she came up with a brilliant plan to prove herself wrong.

The professor got the university to hire two actors to play Trump and Clinton but she reversed their sexes. A woman played Trump and a man played Hillary.  The performance was a verbatim recreation of one of the debates.



Okay, which one would you vote for?

If you decided that this NAFTA hating woman would have made a for a better president than the man you aren't alone.

"We heard a lot of "now I understand how this happened" -- meaning how Trump won the election. People got upset. There was a guy two rows in front of me who was literally holding his head in his hands, and the person with him was rubbing his back. The simplicity of Trump's message became easier for people to hear when it was coming from a woman--that was a theme. One person said, "I'm just so struck by how precise Trump’s technique is."

Forgive me for stating the fucking obvious but the truth is that Hillary was a completely terrible candidate in every way available to her! Trump, who is now the president, has a real talent for political theater. Yet it takes something like this to make them accept reality?

Many were shocked to find that they couldn’t seem to find in Jonathan Gordon what they had admired in Hillary Clinton—

Because it was never there!

or that Brenda King’s clever tactics seemed to shine in moments where they’d remembered Donald Trump flailing or lashing out. 

Okay that part was really funny. If it was Trump doing something then he must be wrong and out of control. But when Brenda King does it, it's totes empowering!

For those Clinton voters trying to make sense of the loss, it was by turns bewildering and instructive, raising as many questions about gender performance and effects of sexism as it answered.

Translation: the political security blanket they had been clutching so very, very tightly to their bosoms (and yes these men do have bosoms)  was suddenly torn away, when they were presented with a woman who actually was a strong competent leadership figure.  Just like Hillary wasn't.

4 comments:

#7139 said...

This is great. Vox needs to pick this article up and link it to Infogalactic News.

Sillon Bono said...

From the article:

"I kind of want to have a beer with her!" The majority of my extended family voted for Trump. In some ways, I developed empathy for people who voted for him by doing this project, which is not what I was expecting. I expected it to make me more angry at them, but it gave me an understanding of what they might have heard or experienced when he spoke."

Could it be that this twat listened to what the woman is saying and did not to what D. Trump was saying because he was biased against D. Trump as he is an indoctrinated gay liberal?

These people either live on a parallel reality or are mentally diseased.

Kentucky Headhunter said...

Reminiscent of the Nixon v. Kennedy debate radio v. TV results.

bob kek mando ( Death To The Boor-geois, Keks To The Lol-etariat ) said...

or that Brenda King’s clever tactics seemed to shine in moments where they’d remembered Donald Trump flailing or lashing out.

this points up the fundamental irrationality of the liberal mind, they are so immured in deceit that they aren't even really capable of discerning when they are LYING TO THEMSELVES.

they can't conceive of a world which is not wholly constructed of people lying to each other, constantly.

Posted by Cataline Sergius
and yes these men do have bosoms



just going to be pedantic because i can, every man ( every person, actually ) has A bosom.

if you're going to say that a particular individual has "bosoms", you're using the wrong term. you mean to say bazooms, which is slang for tits, which is a subset of the chesticular area of the upper torso.