Monday, December 11, 2017

Feminism and the Cuckoldry of the Gamma Male by the State

Julia was never all that onboard

As we have discussed here before, Third Wave Feminism is clearly and obviously a death cult.

Sublimating the sex drive in pursuit of this cult's objectives is the natural course of action for those who wish to destroy human nature.  It's nothing new really.

"The aim of the Party was not merely to prevent men and women from forming loyalties which it might not be able to control. Its real, undeclared purpose was to remove all pleasure from the sexual act. Not love so much as eroticism was the enemy, inside marriage as well as outside it. All marriages between Party members had to be approved by a committee appointed for the purpose, and – though the principle was never clearly stated – permission was always refused if the couple concerned gave the impression of being physically attracted to one another. The only recognized purpose of marriage was to beget children for the service of the Party. Sexual intercourse was to be looked on as a slightly disgusting minor operation, like having an enema. This again was never put into plain words, but in an indirect way it was rubbed into every Party member from childhood onwards. There were even organizations such as the Junior, Anti-Sex League, which advocated complete celibacy for both sexes. All children were to be begotten by artificial insemination (artsem, it was called in Newspeak) and brought up in public institutions."

The extinguishment of the straight male sex drive is the unspoken of but all desired endstate of Third Wave Feminism.

 Male tastes in women's bodies are imperatively taught as being wrong. 

Finding this woman attractive is sexist
Yes, I'm sexist

Complete submission to feminism is now openly demanded in every aspect of male sexuality.  Affirmative Consent is now the law in California and is spreading out from there.  A man who does not grovel for explicit permission for every single part of sex is guilty of sexual assault.  Complementing a woman's looks online is sexual assault. Staring at girl too long is sexual assault.  Sitting with your legs too far apart is sexual assault.

Everything short of actual sexual assault is now sexual assault.  That which is forbidden is mandatory for the modern feminist.  Male Submission is now mandatory.

 And I do mean Submission in the sexual sense of the word.  Men are to be on the bottom as the bottom in any feminist relationship.   The Modern Man is now required to submit as a cuckold in all parts of his existence and is to do so willingly.

I'm not the only one who has noticed this.

Cuckmercials, as I shall now be calling them, are totally explicit about portraying “American husbands as feckless wimps.” That quote refers to the Kia commercial where a beta dad suggests they park somewhere safe as mom runs the car “up the gut” and parks on a hill before topping the whole thing off with “Someone has to wear the pants in this family.” The message is no longer that women are equal. It’s that women are the new men and they’re doing a way better job. Commercials are propaganda because it’s good for business. Campbell’s Soup realizes only a miniscule fraction of their clientele are gay parents, but having two fathers quote Darth Vader’s “I’m your father” gets all the virtue-signaling progressives who might otherwise go with Progresso.

Star Wars: The Force Awakens is a perfect example of this anything-but-dad mentality. The movie starts off with a female protagonist who is so perfect, she has no room to grow. At least Luke knew he was a douche and wanted to get over it. This ├╝berwomensch knows everything about everything and can beat up anyone. She knows more about the Millennium Falcon than Han Solo and she’s only been in it for minutes. When she faces the new Darth Vader, Kylo Ren, she only needs to hear the word “Force” to instantly become a way better Jedi than him. At the end of the movie (spoiler alert) he is sent away for more training so he can be worthy of fighting this female gift from God. The other hero of the movie is a black man and he’s equally dull. He’s so perfect and pure and wildly naive, he’s basically a useless baby. Both of these characters are so pure of heart, they are totally devoid of

(Gavin McInnes)

If a feminist's wife wants to screw around on him.  He has to be totes cool about it but then he is rewarded by being acknowledged as a good feminist.  No matter how disgusting his wife's boyfriend finds him.

There is now a generation of men that have been taught since infancy to despise their own sex. An amazing number are on board with it.  They have absorbed so much if this bilge into their psyches that these men (and it is men doing it) are now strongly pushing black on white, man/woman relationships in every facet of popular culture.

In 1947?

This is all part and parcel of the sexual submissive fetish known as Cuckolding. Wherein a white man impotently watches as a black man has sex with his wife.  It is now being pushed hard from grade school onward.

Yes the team is called the Bulldogs.
Yes, that is her boyfriend on the right.
Yes, she's the quarterback.

The big question that has to be asked is how the hell did the Hivemind manage to get men, (even liberal men) to go along with this one.

The answer is simple; Status derived from Identity. 

Identify as a Male Feminist and you will instantly enjoy status from popular culture. Salesmanship 101 all human endeavor almost always boils down to an attempt to raise your own status.

And status is something the Modern Man is sorely lacking.

This presented a critical opportunity to the Hivemind.  The Hivemind is unintelligent but it does constantly experiment.  It learns quickly from the results and moves rapidly to reinforce success.

It has after decades of trial and error, it came up with the Thirty Percent Solution.  You don't try to convince all the men.  Just enough of them.

The Gamma Males loath and detest traditional manhood instinctively.  They are in truth nature's male feminists.

The top fifteen percent are nature's Alpha's so forget about them.  They were never in the mix.  Now, if you can recruit one or two of them, awesome.   Don't bother with more than that.  Those few will act as your extremely hypocritical and well rewarded Judas Goats for Male Feminism.

Yeah. Right
Women want to fuck Sherlock because he's a feminist
Got it asshole

The battleground for feminism became the guys in the middle.  But the center of gravity is the lower fifteen percent. The Gamma Male.  The loud and obnoxious anchor that tugs at the middle ranks of men.

Which is ironic because no group has suffered more from the ravages of feminism than the Gamma Male.

In the Fifties and Sixties, a  Gamma Male would graduate high school, be drafted and do his time.  Then get married at around age twenty two and start making a good life for himself as a husband, father and provider...because his wife made him do it.

Gammas got married because women NEEDED men.  Not liked having one around but needed (life and death needed) a husband.   There was no life of Julia back then.  If a girl didn't land and keep a man, she would stay in Dad's house forever.  There were almost no career tracks available that would allow a woman to become economically independent.  There upward mobility in society was completely dependent upon riding a husband's coat tails.

The male need for a wife was mostly emotional but it was massively reinforced by society.  Past a certain age, older men in your life would start lecturing you about your need to find a nice girl and settle down. 

There were no such lectures being given to girls.  They all knew they needed a man and it was a matter of the most dire desperation indeed if they couldn't catch a beau.

Then in the 1980s that all started to change.  Support systems that promoted the advancement of women were coming into play.  Women didn't need men anymore other than for recreational sex.

Down hill trends were set in motion for the Gamma Male.  His traditional means of acquiring status were stripped away from him one by one.  Husband, gone. Head of a household, gone.  Career advancement, gone.

They only means the Gamma man had left for acquiring status was identity.  Adopt the identity of a high status group and you in turn receive that identity's status.   Yes, you would have to publicly shame yourself as an oppressive tool of the privileged patriarchy, even if you weren't all that privileged.  But because of "effort justification" you would be even more committed as a male feminist for having humiliated yourself repeatedly in public.  The Gamma men had learned to love Big Brother.

Sadly those Gammas that manage to take the Red Pill aren't all that better off because they are still Gammas.  Unless brutal self-assessment, followed by rigorous self-improvement is conducted, the only identity open to the Red Pill Gamma Male is that of the PUA hating MGTOW.

The biggest problem feminism has today is convincing women to go along with it.

While this is being portrayed as the ideal of modern manhood by feminists

Women infuriatingly still want this:


SciVo said...

It's impossible for a feminist woman to respect a feminist man, so her empty womb forces her to import rapey third-worlders. The selfish gene doesn't care about her feelz, just getting replicated.

Law Network said...

It's one of nature's checks and balances --- since feminists men are unfit to survive, and they are being bred out of the gene pool in favor of replicants.

Avalanche said...

"Women want to fuck Sherlock because he's a feminist"

Women want to fuck Sherlock because he's broken and hurt and, as innate nurturers, we want to HEAL him! Just as we are biologically drawn to a crying baby, we are biologically drawn to a crying ... er ... baby in a man's body! Back when men kept their thumbs on their women (disallowing the random application of our nurturing), that innate nurturing was correctly directed toward OUR young and ill/wounded and elderly (and was, thus, a STRENGTH for our people!).

When y'all let yer thumbs up off us, our "Nature-al" helping/healing desires expanded to cover not just children but childish races (subspecies)(that YOU allowed into our purview, without also keeping a tight leash on our natures) and the twisted and damaged adults of our own tribe. (If I may suggest? Blaming WOMEN for having this innate 'strength' and then writing them off is probably not the first-best choice for trying to recover our people! Maybe consider that women look for a strong alpha-type male because they WANT boundaries, they WANT someone to 'direct' (and control!) their innate desire to help/heal.

I was a shrill vicious feminist in my younger days. Exposure to reality -- followed by marriage to an alpha -- recovered me to normality. Women are built (designed?) to "fit into" their milieu (their tribe). If that milieu says: 'be a slut' or 'hate men' ... then that is where (women will believe, in the biological unconscious sense) safety and life lie. It did take my beloved alpha a couple of years of intensive questioning and discussing to help me cast off the idiocy I had been programed with -- but it IS doable! Because I LOVED him (first) I had to learn to reconcile his amazing honor and 'alpha-ness' with his "horrid" beliefs: now, I completely share those beliefs! But without love making me stick around? I probably would never have awakened.

(Yeah, yeah, solipsism... sorry. But I believe it is also an example of a principle.)

Johnny said...

>>"Women want to fuck Sherlock because he's a feminist"

>>Women want to fuck Sherlock because he's broken and hurt and, as innate nurturers, we want to HEAL him!

Going by what I have seen of the world, women want the dominant male, the Alpha male, and they are willing to submit to him to get him. But then as the relationship becomes stable (if it does), they end up grating under his leadership. They still accommodate him and may still admire him, but somewhat resent it and are inclined to, shall we say, cut him down to size. This is the female emotional complexity. They want the man to be superior, but resent it if he is.

The other side of it is when the man turns out to be not all that special. More than one outcome is possible, but not too uncommonly it can turn nurturing. The man becomes rather like another child in the family. This is the he is broken and "we want to HEAL him" impulse.

I am not sure about women, but when it comes to men, sharing power is the exception. In any male group, the natural tendency will be for one of them to become the leader. As this plays out in marriage, the whole premise of shared power is bunk. One of the two parties will be the leader, the other the follower.

A family fully filled out has three parties: the husband, the wife, and the kids. The strongest bond is between the female and the children. The weakest is the one that attaches the man to the family. In traditional society it was assumed that the man was the head of the household, and that was part of the lure that kept the family together in that it gave the man a reason to stay with it. Now that we have abandoned that concept we get what should be expected, the footloose man who at best makes alimony payments, and at worst is no more than a sperm donor.